Which of the following best compares the Ming and Qing dynasties in China to the Ottoman, Safavid, and Mughal empires?

AThe Ming and Qing dynasties were poor, while the Ottoman, Safavid, and Mughal empires grew prosperous through trade.
BThe Ming and Qing dynasties practiced Christianity, while the Ottoman, Safavid, and Mughal empires practiced Buddhism.
CThe Ming and Qing dynasties both created empires using gunpowder weapons, but the Ottoman, Safavid, and Mughal empires did not.
DThe Ming and Qing dynasties were more isolated, while the Ottoman, Safavid, and Mughal empires interacted more with neighboring cultures.

I believe the answer to this is C. C. The Ming and Qing dynasties both created empires using gunpowder weapons, but the Ottoman, Safavid, and Mughal empires did not.

Answer Link

holesstanham holesstanham · Answer 2 · 2019-06-17T19:10:43-04:00

Answer:

C. The Ming and Qing dynasties both created empires using gunpowder weapons, but the Ottoman, Safavid, and Mughal empires did not.

Explanation:

The Ming and Qing dynasties were able to create empires using gunpowder weapons because gunpowder was first developed in China, and from there, it spread to the whole world. However, the Ottoman, Safavid and Mughal empires were also able to control large amounts of people and vast territories through the use of other various weapons.