Those who favor election of judges to their positions believe it

Aleads to higher-quality judicial decisions because the judges are not pressured by the views of the public

Bforces judges to interpret law in the best interests of the people rather than those of certain politicians

Callows for more time to conduct judicial review and more detailed opinions on very important cases

Dprevents judges from basing their judicial decisions on the will of the majority rather than the laws

I am pretty sure thay yhe only statement that makes sense is the last option represented above. Those who favor election of judges to their positions believe it forces judges to interpret law in the best interests of the people rather than those of certain politicians.

Answer Link

yawningnature yawningnature · Answer 2 · 2019-05-02T11:45:09-04:00

Answer:

b. forces judges to interpret law in the best interests of the people rather than those of certain politicians

Explanation:

The selection of judges has troubled many over the years. Most State court judges in the United States are selected by popular election basically because according with Jacksonian populism, it makes judges accountable to the will of the people. They are forced to be responsive to public opinion.

The rest of the world select their judges based on technical skill. The executive branch officials select judges, which is how federal judges in the United States are chosen.