Why do you think American writers of subsequent literary periods often choose to break from traditions and seek more freedom in their artistic expression? Are writers justified in challenging the artistic status quo? Why or why not?
American writers often break from literary tradition because, the audience always wants something new, surprising, unusual, etc. Like anything else on this world Authors change. I believe that writers are justified in challenging the status quo because literacy is an art, and like any kind of art it evolves and changes creating new things. Any attempt to stop change is simply wrong and insult against creativity.
Writers choose to break with artistic traditions to be innovative, pioneers in something different. Writers can justify this attitude by asserting that art is something alive, constantly changing, like all living beings.
We can arrive at this answer because:
Thus, we can say that these changes strengthen the role of art and literature in humanity, showing them as something capable of following human beings and their entire evolution.
More information:
https://brainly.com/question/643023