The correct option is: "criminal investigation and court procedures
"
- Miranda against Arizona (1966), was a Landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States. The court held that both incriminating and exculpatory statements made in response to an interrogation by a defendant in police custody are admissible in a trial only if the prosecution can show that the defendant was informed before being questioned of what is currently being questioned. he knows as Miranda warning: his right to consult a defense lawyer before and during interrogation, and the right not to self-incriminate himself. And besides, you should not only understand these rights, but you should also give them up voluntarily.
- Mapp v. Ohio in this case the Supreme Court ruled that evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment to the US Constitution. UU That prohibits "unreasonable searches and seizures" is inadmissible in state courts.
Gideon v. Wainwright the Supreme Court ruled unanimously that states are bound by the Sixth Amendment to the US Constitution. UU Providing a lawyer to defendants in criminal cases that their own lawyers can not afford.
