princesslori princesslori

17-09-2016
History

Answered

Why must historians always be skeptical when they read primary sources documents?

Verified Answer :

shadowfall shadowfall

17-09-2016

Because they could be biased and strongly opinionated and also the primary source does not have the benefit of hindsight and is therefore not a valid interpretation and less credible

Answer Link

Related Questions

HELPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP

Simplify 03 1 34

Foreign languages are extremely important to students education After taking my first Spanish course I saw a significant increase in my English grade As a stude

In 1944 reindeer were introduced to an optimal habitat on St Matthew Island in the Bering Sea The population grew exponentially until the winter of 196364 when

two men on opposite sides of a TV tower of height 20m notice the angle of elevation of the top of the tower to be 45 and 60 respectively find the distance in me

What is the correct ratio of each rational root of the polynomial function fx 5x5 x3 3x 6

When deciding how to deal with negative feelings why should you evaluate the causes of your issue

Joseph Unahue made his fortune in

who is the antagonist in the book if I stay

The Truman Doctrine was the Presidents request from Congress for 400 million dollars in aid mostly to this country to stop Soviet expansion in the eastern Medit

Web Analytics Made Easy - Statcounter